| Redeemer Insanity http://vm.n6nu.org/bbs/ |
|
| PC vs. MAC vs. Windows vs. Linux http://vm.n6nu.org/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1931 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Pebcak [ Wed Mar 02, 2005 5:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | PC vs. MAC vs. Windows vs. Linux |
Hello All, Had to do it. What do you run? PC or MAC or something else? Off the shelf or built it yourself? Windows flavor? MAC favor? Linux flavor? Please tell I have an AMD box that I built myself running Windows XP as my main game box. Have a few Dell boxes running Pro Mepis Linux (Debian based my personal fave) and Windows Server 2003. |
|
| Author: | LePoLoo [ Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Damn : war starts again !!! :D It will be a tough fight between Mac or PC !!!... I use a PC (assembled parts) with XP and UT does pretty well with that stuff ! 8) |
|
| Author: | n6nu [ Wed Mar 02, 2005 10:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I run WIndows 2000 on the desktop and 3 Linux FC3 Machines. N6NU |
|
| Author: | {FAH}Q [ Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Commodore 64. Much more stable than any Windows machine. |
|
| Author: | Fluffy the Bunny [ Wed Mar 02, 2005 3:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ah the beast has awoke!!! :wink: |
|
| Author: | {FAH}Q [ Wed Mar 02, 2005 3:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
:twisted: |
|
| Author: | a nameless entity [ Wed Mar 02, 2005 3:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
{FAH}Q wrote: Commodore 64. Much more stable than any Windows machine.
:o :o :o It's about time you *UPGRADED* don't you think? :lol: |
|
| Author: | The Jargonaut [ Wed Mar 02, 2005 4:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yes, I hear you can get a great deal on an Amiga :) |
|
| Author: | Fluffy the Bunny [ Wed Mar 02, 2005 4:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
This might be much akin to putting the toothpaste back into the tube. 8) |
|
| Author: | Hermskii [ Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | LOL |
LOL, I can't lose! I run both Mac and PC and not afraid of Linux either. I win! |
|
| Author: | Pebcak [ Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hey All, Did I miss a good flame war in the past on this subject? How about adding IE vs. Firefox vs. Netscape vs. Mozilla vs. Safari etc.? |
|
| Author: | {FAH}Q [ Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I.E. has got to be the worst browser in existence. Oh no wait maybe Netscape is. Nah I.E. is. What was I thinking? Although I'm an apple guy it's a toss up for me between Firefox and Safari. Mozilla is solid and IMHO should be used instead of I.E. Oh yeah did I mention that MS sucks. :twisted: |
|
| Author: | ThE OnE [ Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Firefox is just a jumped up version of Netscape |
|
| Author: | {FAH}Q [ Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'd actually consider Mozilla to be more like Netscape than Firefox. Mozilla looks and fees just like Netscape except it runs better. Firefox on the other hand I think is much snappeir and less quirky then Netscape. In a nut shell both Mozilla & Firefox are basically versions of Netscape, but they are much improved versions so why would you want to use Netscape anymore. I'm not sure what version of netscape they have on their PC's at work but I find it kind of amussing that you have to type in WWW every time you want to pull up a website. Even I.E. will find a site by just typing in the name without the WWW or http://. Using Netscape or I.E. is like using a PC. It's just stupid. :razz: :twisted: :lol: By the way did you guys see that Bill Gates was knighted. That's like knighting Satan. |
|
| Author: | DARKMATTER [ Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: By the way did you guys see that Bill Gates was knighted. That's like knighting Satan.
Do you mean told to get knotted typo maybe ???lol no seriously who by???? Dark :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 7 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|